|
Educate, Educate,
Educate
How important is an understanding of food and nutrition
to society? How do we measure the importance people place
on food quality and how do we increase the value they place
on it? We know that consumers who care most about food quality,
healthy diet and biodiversity are the most likely to be
consumers of organic food. So education is about getting
down to the roots of peoples understanding and helping
them make the connections.
There are considerable shades of difference in peoples
priorities concerning food. One way to measure this is by
total food expenditure. The average American spends seven
per cent of their income on food, the average Briton 10
per cent and the average Frenchman 18 per cent.
Shopping, cooking and eating occupy one in six of our waking
hours. So youd think that understanding the importance
of food is one of the key life skills we should
all have acquired as adults. Most food education of the
public is focused on food safety and avoiding food poisoning
from bugs that shouldnt be in food in the first place.
Its clear that what we want to see is an understanding
of food that will help ensure that peoples lives are
productive, happy, healthy and not prematurely terminated
by food-related illnesses. This makes sense for economic,
political, social and ethical reasons, which should not
need to be elaborated.
With few exceptions, in 12 years of primary and secondary
education most children learn nothing about food, nutrition
and health apart from tangential and reductionist references
in biology, where the human digestive system and metabolism
are studied. Home economics, a study previously restricted
to female students, has been abandoned altogether as a result
of curriculum changes. Yet this acted as a feeder
course for students who went on to study food technology.
Students leave school able to calculate the collision time
of two trains travelling at different speeds in opposite
directions but unable to boil an egg or bake a loaf of bread.
Ignorance of the fundamentals of food quality and diet occur
where a rational person would least expect. In the four
years of medical education that a doctor undergoes before
qualification, just four hours are spent studying the subject
of nutrition and health. In most hospitals the dietician
or nutritionist is a lowly staff member, who is not allowed
to diagnose and whose main role is to issue pre-programmed
nutritional advice.
But children do get information, I hesitate to call it education,
about food. Its worth considering what we are up against
and to some extent what we should emulate. British
children are exposed to 10 TV commercials an hour for confectionery
and other sugary, fatty foods. Between the age of two and
12 a Canadian child will see 100,000 television commercials
for food. By the age of three one in five American toddlers
are making specific brand name requests for food. In the
US Channel One is a daily 12-minute in-classroom current
events broadcast. It features ten minutes of news and two
minutes of commercials. Companies pay up to $195,000 for
a 30-second ad, knowing that they have a captive audience
of 8 million students across the country.
Coca-Cola pays schools and supplies educational material
in exchange for exclusive rights to position drinks vending
machines in schools. In Colorado Springs Coke cut an $8
million deal with the school district to allow unlimited
access to Coke machines and to allow students to drink Coke
in the classroom. Elsewhere Pepsi contributed $1.5 million
to build a sports stadium. In exchange the science curriculum
includes a study of a Carbonated Beverage Company that includes
a visit to the local Pepsi bottling plant. That was in Jefferson
County, Colorado, home of Columbine High School. School
busses are hotly sought after in the States by advertisers
such as Wendys and Burger King. If you ever have occasion
to fly into Dallas, look down at the Dr. Pepper and 7-Up
logos on the rooftops of the two high schools near the airport.
Theyre part of an exclusive vending machine deal.
Pizza Hut run a Book-It! programme to encourage
kids to read, the reward is a personal pan pizza. Hersheys
chocolate provide the entire curriculum for one grades
maths, science, geography and nutrition under the title
of Chocolate Dream Machine.
How can children possibly obtain a balanced view of healthy
nutrition in the face of such overwhelming corporate influence?
Is the answer to restrict such influence? ... or to buy
our way into the system? I suggest that its a bit
of both. The hierarchy of information distribution is flattening
with advances in desktop publishing capabilities, in access
to broadband, and with new channels of information dissemination.
Luckily were in Britain, where newspapers exist on
the basis of their circulation sales income. Readers respond
to stories about healthy eating and organic food, so the
press are valuable allies in spreading our message. This
is very different to the US press, which serves the interests
of the grocery advertisers who keep it going by buying dozens
of pages of food ads daily. There has never been a food
scare in America the media are too intimidated. We
have a persuasive story to tell and people, including journalists,
who grasp it, find it holds together seamlessly.
The challenge is not that mountainous and we have already
established a base camp near the summit. We dont have
to swing 100% of the population around to the organic worldview
for it to prevail. What we need to do is create an educated
bloc of consumers who manufacturers, retailers and foodservice
companies ignore at their peril. We are well along the road
already towards building this critical mass but we still
need to broaden and deepen our reach. Weve got the
affluent elderly and the young, hip parents leaning most
heavily in our direction, the young families and their grandparents.
The lost generations in between are in our sights.
Id like to quote the President of General Mills when
asked about Genetically engineered ingredients in their
breakfast cereals..
Our research shows that 8-9% of American consumers
will not buy a product if they know it contains GM ingredients
thats too large a chunk of our customer base
to ignore unless GM offers some real benefits elsewhere.
Perhaps I should also mention Vladimir Illyich Lenin in
this context, who said: Give me 5% of Russias
population as Bolsheviks and the revolution will surely
follow. He actually did it with a much lower percentage,
but with unacceptable resort to violence.
It costs a company a great deal to develop brand loyalties.
An educated consumer base can and will force changes from
the bottom up in the values of well-managed brands that
do not want to lose their expensively-acquired loyal customers.
So what other examples can we look to?
The mother of all healthy eating education programmes was
The Peckham Experiment in South London in the 1940s which
showed that, when a group of families learned the fundamentals
of nutrition and healthy eating their children did better
at school, crime rates fell, domestic strife was reduced
and overall health improved. It was run by two of the eight
founders of the Soil Association, which shows how deep our
roots run on education. Prisons where healthy food has been
introduced or where prisoners develop an understanding of
vegetable gardening, farming and food production, show lower
rates of violence and recidivism. We know what we are doing
is the right thing for society.
So what are we doing and what more can we do?
The Soil Association Demonstration Farms Network helps educate
children in the origins of food with the aim that every
child in Britain will have visited an organic farm and been
educated in the fundamentals of food production by the age
of 12. 100,000 kids visited an organic farm this year, there
are 20 farms in the programme and we have funding to increase
this number. Children remember 20 per cent of what they
are told and 80 per cent of what they do, so farm visits
have a real and lasting educational impact. Because organic
farms usually have a mixture of crops and livestock the
whole picture of food production can be studied. Demonstration
farms include a farm trail that allows kids to see animals
close-up, help them understand the connection between sustainable
farming and care of the countryside, and the chance to buy
fresh organic food from the farm shop or taste something
at the farm café. The challenge is then to encourage
an ongoing interest in wholesome fresh food perhaps
to offer box schemes.
Schools, hospitals, canteens in public and private enterprises
are all targets for improving choice and nutrition. Public/private
partnerships open the door to some possibilities. Sodexho
is one of the worlds largest caterers, with interests
in foodservice in schools, hospitals, factories and transportation.
They now have an organic division, called Organica. Its
main customer base at this time is upscale events such as
Goodwood, Ascot, Henley, Lords, weddings and banquets, but
their eye is fixed firmly on a future where parents of children
who have been reared organically will demand the same choices
for their children at school as vegetarian parents demanded
- and obtained - in the 1980s. If Italy can make locally
sourced organic food in school meals public policy, then
so can we.
Defra now have organic food available in their canteens
and for committees and working groups. This began with UKROFS
related activities but has now spread throughout the department.
If they can do it, every organisation should be able to.
A missed opportunity this year was the Catering Conference
For Schools, which took place earlier this summer. Next
year there will be a Soil Association speaker at their conference,
so attendance by organic suppliers could help open doors
into this important marketplace and to increase our industrys
understanding of the mechanics of reaching this sector.
A first step to getting organic food into schools is to
educate the caterers who supply the schools. As I mentioned
earlier, Sodexho are already Soil Association certified
and on the inside track.
The Soil Association has made available a schools pack for
some ten years that contains valuable and well-structured
teaching aids that increase primary school kids understanding
of agriculture, with an emphasis on organics. Its
a bit long in the tooth now, but got a positive response
from schools where it was used as part of the curriculum.
It needs updating, perhaps to include a DVD and video element.
Perhaps a collaboration with the Guild of Food Writers would
help to broaden its appeal and increase public awareness
of the availability of this teaching tool. If Coke can spend
$190,000 for a 30 second spot on schools TV in the US, lets
hope that there are some organic processors who can see
the benefits of sponsoring something of genuine value and
at a much lower cost.
There are developments in updating the food technology curriculum
that can
increase its appeal. Placements and sponsorship for students
will help deepen their understanding and commitment to the
organic way of thinking. Food technologists who understand
the holistic environmental and nutritional picture about
food will be well-placed for career advancement and I am
sure that a well-constructed curriculum would not suffer
any shortage of candidates. Our industry, as working environments
go, is one of the most enjoyable and fulfilling, so placements
will ensure future interest in our sector.
The Soil Association has a good record for putting on one
day seminars that have helped bring real progress to sectors
such as eggs, dairy, horticulture and meat production. A
seminar that provided a forum for discussion relating to
curriculum changes, catering considerations, and careers
advice would attract interested parties from schools, colleges,
universities and other interested organisations. Perhaps
we can explore what shape such a seminar could take in this
afternoons open forum.
Im a member of the Caroline Walker Trust, which was
established in memory of the eponymous campaigning nutritionist.
Its Chairman is Peter Bazalgette, now best known for the
Big Brother programmes, but who made his mark with the Food
and Drink Programme. (Trust members, along with the Food
Commission and the member groups of Sustain, such as Womens
Institute and Townswomens Guild, are our natural allies
and we should keep the door open for their support of our
goals). The Caroline Walker Trust have an award category
for student nutritionist of the year. A similar
award for a student who has shown initiative or undertaken
a significant project to do with organic food could be introduced
at next years Organic Business Awards. This would
send a signal to students and their teachers that there
are short term as well as longer term rewards in developing
understanding of organics.
We are much bigger and more powerful than we think. How
many of you realise that the global market for organic food,
at £16 billion, is 6 times the global market for genetically
engineered seed, at £2.7 billion? Yet the 4 companies
in the world that sell genetically engineered seed have
far more influence in universities, over governments and
in the business community because they use their power in
a coordinated, controlled, focused and selfish way. Our
£16 billion pound global community numbers in the
hundreds of thousands, from small producers to multinationals.
We need to be organised and focused and clarify exactly
what our medium and long term goals are. It would be great
if we could create a set of key educational goals, a Declaration
of Intent, so to speak, that we could all sign up
to and that we could all support in a coordinated and cooperative
way. We know were right and anyone who studies the
issues of food and farming in any depth ends up agreeing
with us. Weve captured the moral, scientific and intellectual
high ground. Now its time to get organised and capture
the middle ground - the mass market. The Soil Association
has proven that it has the capability to act as your vehicle
for educating society at all levels we need to expand
and build on our successes so far. Your support and commitment
is an essential ingredient. Lets go for it!
|