organic vegetables

Hydroponics

Back in the 1940s, Eve Balfour wrote a book called The Living Soil that became, along with Sir Albert Howard’s An Agricultural Testament, the bible of the organic movement.  Albert and Eve were going to call farming in harmony with nature ‘Biological’ farming, but J.I.Rodale, Eve’s pal in the US, persuaded her that ‘Organic’ was a better name.  Organic farming is biological’  farming in that the carbohydrate produced by plants fuels the biological engine of microbes, worms and other creatures in the soil that converts soil nutrients into food for the plant.

So…what happens when there’s no soil involved?

When hydroponic farming came along, the organic movement was divided.  How could we not grow things in soil and call them ‘organic?’  The proponents said that hydroponics mimicked soil by using peat or coir as the growing medium, infused with water and organic nutrients.  The Soil Association allows peat and coir, but only for starting plants out or to improve soil, but not as a growing medium on its own. So as hydroponics wasn’t ‘soil’ it wasn’t approved. The EU organic regulations also prohibit hydroponic growing.  However, the US organic regulations do allow hydroponic growing. They require that the nutrients are organically approved and no pesticides or other prohibited inputs are used.  It’s what they call ‘bioponic’ – in other words as long as the biological activity is the same as in organic growing, where microbes in the soil interact with nutrients and plants, it is the same, functionally, as growing in soil.

We have an equivalence agreement with the US that allows the import and export of organic foods even where there may be some differences in regulations.  This is one of those differences and it’s now being reviewed on both sides.

I should declare my interest.  Our company Carbon Gold sells soil improver to organic greenhouse growers who benefit from the benificial biological impact of enriched biochar which encourages the active microorganisms that typify healthy soil.  It does it by providing a huge surface area that enables them to flourish.  With it they can grow tomatoes avoid suffering from soil-borne diseases.  But we also sell much more to non-organic growers who value the fact that, whether combined with coir or peat, biochar’s biological boost enables them to reduce or eliminate pesticide use and enjoy higher yields, by plugging in to the ‘soil food web.’   So I’m walking both sides of the street and ‘conventional’ growers are reducing their dependency on pesticides and inputs.

Farmers who grow hydroponically and using biology are getting yields and quality up, too. It’s reached a point where a grower in Holland can get 80 tonnes of vine tomatoes per hectare, a 10-15% increase, by working with biology.  It would be unfortunate if branding such as ‘pesticide-free’ or ‘LEAF’ were to predominate with consumers who just want a ‘clean’ product that is free of pesticide residues.  Most aren’t bothered if the roots of the plant were in soil or instead in some kind of soil-like mixture off the ground.  They just don’t want to eat pesticides.  Strawberries, cucumbers, peppers, lettuce and salad crops all perform brilliantly in controlled situations. Performance equals competitiveness.

 Organic growers use peat in greenhouses and also steam sterilise their soil between growing seasons.  This raises ecological and biological questions that are uncomfortable to answer.  With ‘bioponics’ you recreate the biological conditions of growing in soil, but in troughs that allow at least 180 litres of soil per square metre – this means ‘feeding the soil’ rather than ‘feeding the plant’ and looks like it may be the compromise way forward.  For the past 5 years I have been growing vegetables (for my own use) in my greenhouse in troughs 2 feet off the ground that contain 400 litres of homemade soil per square metre.  I use the same troughs in the spring to propagate healthy plants that are then planted out and sold as Soil Association certified.  And I’ve never had to steam sterilise or use peat.

This affects everyone.  When you go into a supermarket the first thing you see is fresh vegetables.  In Denmark fresh fruit and vegetables are 30% of the organic market. The same proportions apply in the UK.  25 years ago, when organic was first making headway the only organic products supermarkets bothered with were fresh produce. That’s because people are most passionate about organic when they are buying fresh fruit and vegetables.   If organic vegetable growers lose ground because they can’t take full advantage of the clean growing breakthroughs in biological technologies and pest controls then they’re not the only ones who will suffer.  The entire organic marketplace will be weakened if consumers start to choose non-organic ‘clean’ fruit and vegetables.  Once consumers have weakened their commitment to the organic ‘brand’ it can have unwanted repercussions on all their other purchasing. 

So the transatlantic debate about hydroponics, bioponics and earth affects us all, not just vegetable growers. 

Who gives a toss about tiny differences in vitamins and minerals?

The fixation with tiny nutritional differences between organic and non-organic is a silly distraction from the real issues, writes Craig Sams.

I’m having a bit of a ‘Duh’ moment I’m afraid.]

20 years ago, way back in 1992 I wrote and recorded a song called “Eat Organic Save the Planet.”  It was part of a promotion by Whole Earth Foods that created the model that has been applied for September organic promotions ever since.  We produced ‘Eat Organic’ leaflets, badges for kids, shelf talkers offering 10% off , printed window posters and gave a prize to the retailer who had the best organic window display with Cheryl Thallon as the judge. The song was on a cassette tape and we gave one to every participating shop to play on their music system. Our job was to push retailers to switch from our ‘natural’ products to the new organic versions we had developed, despite the price differences.

The song’s lyrics set out the argument:

“The weather round the world is getting very strange

As the Amazon rain forest turns into a cattle range

But still you keep on buying all those products that they sell

Eating burgers, drinking coffee, let the Indians go to hell

Eat Organic – Save the Planet”

And

“If you’re part of the problem then you’re holding us back

We’re fighting for survival put the world back on the track

Clean your act up, eat organic and be part of the solution

It’s time to take the next step in the planet’s evolution”

And

“One day we’ll lose the land that our lives are built upon

Then the next thing has to be that we will all be gone”

And

“If we really want to save this planet of our birth

We’ve got to place some value on what life on Earth is worth

If we didn’t spray so many toxic pesticides

All those different species never would’ve died”

So when some monomaniac academics at Stanford say organic is no better than non-organic because it has the same level of vitamin content I can’t take it seriously. They don’t get it. They probably never will.  They are part of the problem and are accessories after the fact (to use the correct legal terminology) to the murder of our beloved planet, which in effect is the murder of all of us.

Organic farming protects biodiversity; it helps get carbon out of the atmosphere and into the soil via composting; it combats global warming by not using nitrate fertilisers (responsible for 1/7 of the annual increase in greenhouse gases); it doesn’t produce sick animals or milk from cows that die when they’re three years old; it helps restore soils that were built up over thousands of years and have been horribly degraded in the past 50 years; it encourages wildlife, birds and bees and other vital pollinators instead of killing them with sprayed poisons; it doesn’t use pesticides that are proven causes of birth defects – defects that are intergenerational and where your grandchildren get the hardest hit from them. Organic farming uses half the fossil fuels of non-organic; organic farmers are younger and prettier (they are 30% younger and six times more likely to be female) than non-organic farmers; organic farming never uses genetically modified seeds or hormonal milk drugs which have never been properly tested for human safety; organic farming never uses sex hormones to build up layers of muscle and fat; organic farmers don’t routinely give antibiotics to their animals just to make them grow a little faster, not least because this breeds antibiotic-resistant diseases that cross-infect and kill humans. Organic food never contains hydrogenated fat, named or disguised as mono- and di-glycerides of fatty acids; or artificial flavourings, colourings, preservatives.

Jeez, I’m exhausted just running through this list.

So who really gives a toss about tiny differences in vitamins and minerals? It’s one thing (along with ‘it tastes better’) that I’ve always felt is totally irrelevant. We make food choices using our better judgement and if we eat a lot of junk food, sugar, alcohol, hydrogenated fat and hormones and antibiotics and pesticides then no amount of extra vitamins will make much difference.

It seems so bleedin’ obvious and it is. People worldwide are going organic.  Farming in the developing world is rejecting GM and going for organic solutions. The black arts of PR-backed ‘experts’ and ‘scientists’ and ‘authorities’ can’t turn back the tide.